Skip to main content

Scientists need to stand by students and their fiends from different religions. Why haven't they not?

In the wake of dystopian events that unfolded last evening at Jamia Milia Islamia, students all across India have organized protests and marches today. IIT Bombay organized a march late in the night, TISS-Bombay, IIT-Madras, BHU, Hyderabad's MANU, AMU along with IISc have reverberated dissent against this barbarism. This is different from the protests civilians are holding all across India. Evidently, the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) - 2019, passed with majority in both houses is simply unacceptable by the general public. And why not? Week before last, news was filled with stories of rape and murder of women. In the following week, the parliamentary houses passed the CAA in a rush I wish they'd show for the safety of women or/and climate change!

Although I should blame everyone equally for their silence on this, my maximum disappointment lies in silence of scientists. CAA categorically excludes Muslims from seeking Indian citizenship if they have migrated from any neighboring countries. Not only is it unconstitutional, it is against the scientific temper of the nation which is already suffering at the hands of self proclaimed god-men and fake news. What good comes out by justifying one's religion to government and why? Isn't science for everyone? Isn't that why scicommers reach more and more students and not think of their religion even for once? What makes you think that religion effects one's research and lab work?! Your silence is a testament to one or both of the two things. Either you simply don't care to what happens to people around you. And/or it reeks of a eugenic mindset - I am smarter because of my race so let the other race be damned. Either way, we are doomed.

If I am to give the scientists a benefit of doubt, they might be simply scared for their jobs or grants etc. It is only human. The only problem here is that science is marketed to everybody with fancy phrases like evidence based learning, critical thinking and accepting a new idea if scientifically sound. In schools and colleges, stories of scientists who stood their ground (like Galileo), persecuted and later proven to be right are told fondly so that the audience understands evidence based conclusion, critiquing everything and be humble when presented with counter evidence. Either don't paint this self-respecting picture or live by it.

And as usual, most Indian researchers have tried to distance themselves when it comes to political issues and turn mute when the government becomes hostile like right now. So many historical examples show the destructive effect of politics resulting in the loss of valuable researchers for a country either to death or to other countries where they made a name for themselves. I will try to compile stories I've heard for a quick revision for anyone in doubt about this. The burden of their silence will be borne by their contemporaries unless they qualify the "Indianness" test.

As far as I am concerned, there should be no such test in the first place. Period.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Separating Science From the Scientist

In October 2016, Ditchling Museum of Art + Craft organized an exhibition to discuss a famous sculptor of 20th century, Eric Gill. The theme of the exhibition was to discuss Gill's art from a fresh perspective of that of an abuser. Later next year, Kevin Spacey was written off House of Cards where he played the lead role following sexual harassment charges. These, among many others, are attempts of art industry to address some uncomfortable questions -  should art of an abuser be appreciated? or rather,  can art be separated from the artist? On this issue, Ed Siegel compared artists to scientists suggesting that it is crucial to evaluate art separate from the artist just as science is evaluated separate from scientists. This is an interesting observation. It implies that the work matters more than the individual. It also implies that with one or more good results, everything uncomfortable about you, all of your personal or professional misdemeanors, can be brushed under the ca...

Is Science a meritocracy?

Update -Finally publishing the draft from dec 2019    Somebody on twitter found it absurd to call science a meritocracy. I would agree to it in the past but now I am not sure.  My prime focus is on marks. It never bothered me until I met two researchers from Max Planck institute in a symposium. Apparently, the grades are taken very seriously in Europe for PhD admission. Just like in India.That is ridiculous on two levels. One, the message it sends out- ONLY high scoring students can, and should be privileged to, make a career in science. Second, the assumption that those students will be good at doing science. Because unlike PhD admission, these may not be followed up with an interview and only based on merit the batch of students is prepared. And the majority, the <85% scoring population, has to look out for other means to show how competent they are. And that is really really worrisome for anyone who wants to increase the engagement of society in STEM o...

Why so complacent in the high drop out rate?

I had an interview recently at a renowned lab here in India. I admired her work and simply couldn't wait to talk to the PI, tour the lab and telling her that I am a big fan. After the interview, the PI told me about how they are little frugal about lab supplies (and the practice apparently served them well), the 11-12 hour commitment to the lab and their high drop-out rate. All of this was to signify how science-y they are probably. However, I found these practices very uncomfortable. Especially her complacency about the drop-out rate. Indian scientists seem to find a merit in the high drop-out rate from their lab. It is like a badge of honor. Why do you have to assume the reason for them leaving is because you are demanding and/or the student is incompetent? That is stupid. There are numerous reasons a student can quit working with someone. It doesn't necessarily have to be something wrong about the student!  Why do you have to showcase it like a crown? It ...