Skip to main content

Lest We Forget- Scientists Who Bore The Brunt Of Divisive Politics


Following my rant on scientists being quiet on the unconstitutional Citizenship Amendment Act, here are a few examples from history in a hope to stir their conscience to act now and stop this hegemonic brutality against students and academics. You see, they call it "brain drain" when academics and researchers leave India. I am hoping not lose next Obaid Sidiqqui, APJ Abdul Kalam or Salim Ali as a minion to this ugly and divisive politics and stop this "brain purge" before happening.

  1. Dr Abdus Salam: Dr Abdus Salam obtained his PhD in Theoretical Physics from Cambridge in 1950. He returned to his home country of Pakistan in 1951 for a lectureship position. He left Pakistan in 1954 but continued to work with government on vital projects. He finally resigned from his post with Pakistani government when in 1974 a law declaring Ahmadis to be non-Muslims and depriving them of their rights was passed, a religion to which he belonged. He was the first Muslim to be awarded the Nobel Prize in 1979. He established International Centre for Theoretical Physics in Trieste, Italy. A documentary on him is available on Netflix. source: BBC
  2. Dr Leonore Brecher: Dr Leonore submitted her doctoral thesis in 1916 on color adaptation in chrysalis. As a trained zoologist she found a teaching position. After working in various institutes on animal physiology including the Biochemical Institute in University of Cambridge, Brecher returned to work Biological Research Institute at Academy of Science in Vienna. In 1938, Brecher lost her job with 14 other university employees because of her religion. She eventually settled as a schoolteacher in a Jewish community- only to be deported in September,14 1942 to Maly Trostinez extermination camp. She was now called 'Prisoner 703' where she was murdered on September 18,1942. (source : Refugeescholars) 
  3. Dr Rudolph Virchow: Virchow, renowned for Cell Theory " Cells arise from pre-existing cells" was banished from Berlin for demanding social reforms like freedom of press and universal healthcare. As per this article, "to avoid formal prosecution and imprisonment, Virchow went to Würzburg in Bavaria." 
  4. Dr Hilda Geiringer: As per Refugeescholars, Hilda Geiringer did her PhD in Double Trignometric (Fourier) Series in 1917 from University of Vienna. a professor of applied mathematics at the University of Berlin, lost her position in 1933 as a result of a newly enacted law that barred Jews from working in state institutions, including all universities. In 1927 she was the first woman employed as a privat-docent at the University of Berlin, faculty of Mathematics. She spent the next six years traveling with her young daughter, trying to find refuge. She finally arrived in the United States in 1939 to take a position at Bryn Mawr College. By 1944 she was appointed at the chairman of the Mathematics Department at Wheaton College in Norton,Massachusetts. 
  5. Dr James Wardrop: Trained as an ophthalmologist, he was awarded MD in 1834. He was a pioneer in identifying retinoblastoma and uveal melanoma. He learned about soft tissue cancers in Vienna, Austria, having fled from France in 1803, when Napoleon ordered that English residents in France be arrested and imprisoned 
  6. Dr Tilly Edinger: As per Refugeescholars, Dr Tilly worked as the curator of the Vertebrate Paleontology department at the Senckenberg Museum in Frankfort,. She held this position until 1938 when the Museum was unable to continue to employ her due to her status as a non-Aryan. By 1940, Edinger had arrived in the United States, and Harvard University's Museum of Comparative Zoology had expressed interest in hiring her. With an Emergency Committee grant, Harvard retained her as a researcher the following year. Edinger was a renowned scientist when two Harvard professors, Harlow Shapley and Alfred S. Romer, requested the university hire her.iary. In 1943-1944, Edinger was a Guggenheim Fellow, and later earned a fellowship from the American Association of University Women (1950-1951). She served as president of the Society for Vertebrate Paleontology in 1963-1964. She continued to work at Harvard, and was well respected in the field.
    source: Jewish Women's Archive
  7. Dr Hans Bethe: Famed physicist who worked in the fields of solid state physics, quantum thermodynamics and received the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1967 for his work in theory of stellar nucleosynthesis was one of the many scientists who had to quit their job in Germany due to his Jewish decent. He went to University of Manchester and later to Cornell University to become a famed physicist.
    source: By Los Alamos National Laboratory - Los Alamos National Laboratory, Attribution, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=71763

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Separating Science From the Scientist

In October 2016, Ditchling Museum of Art + Craft organized an exhibition to discuss a famous sculptor of 20th century, Eric Gill. The theme of the exhibition was to discuss Gill's art from a fresh perspective of that of an abuser. Later next year, Kevin Spacey was written off House of Cards where he played the lead role following sexual harassment charges. These, among many others, are attempts of art industry to address some uncomfortable questions -  should art of an abuser be appreciated? or rather,  can art be separated from the artist? On this issue, Ed Siegel compared artists to scientists suggesting that it is crucial to evaluate art separate from the artist just as science is evaluated separate from scientists. This is an interesting observation. It implies that the work matters more than the individual. It also implies that with one or more good results, everything uncomfortable about you, all of your personal or professional misdemeanors, can be brushed under the ca...

Is Science a meritocracy?

Update -Finally publishing the draft from dec 2019    Somebody on twitter found it absurd to call science a meritocracy. I would agree to it in the past but now I am not sure.  My prime focus is on marks. It never bothered me until I met two researchers from Max Planck institute in a symposium. Apparently, the grades are taken very seriously in Europe for PhD admission. Just like in India.That is ridiculous on two levels. One, the message it sends out- ONLY high scoring students can, and should be privileged to, make a career in science. Second, the assumption that those students will be good at doing science. Because unlike PhD admission, these may not be followed up with an interview and only based on merit the batch of students is prepared. And the majority, the <85% scoring population, has to look out for other means to show how competent they are. And that is really really worrisome for anyone who wants to increase the engagement of society in STEM o...

Why so complacent in the high drop out rate?

I had an interview recently at a renowned lab here in India. I admired her work and simply couldn't wait to talk to the PI, tour the lab and telling her that I am a big fan. After the interview, the PI told me about how they are little frugal about lab supplies (and the practice apparently served them well), the 11-12 hour commitment to the lab and their high drop-out rate. All of this was to signify how science-y they are probably. However, I found these practices very uncomfortable. Especially her complacency about the drop-out rate. Indian scientists seem to find a merit in the high drop-out rate from their lab. It is like a badge of honor. Why do you have to assume the reason for them leaving is because you are demanding and/or the student is incompetent? That is stupid. There are numerous reasons a student can quit working with someone. It doesn't necessarily have to be something wrong about the student!  Why do you have to showcase it like a crown? It ...