Skip to main content

Spilling love for Ghazals: Part #1

One little trick I use on my mum is sing a line or a stanza from a ghazal or a song she likes while she is cooking and leave. She goes around the house singing in her sweet, Hindustani- classical trained voice, chirping  for next 2 hrs. It's like my home comes to life! What a joy!

I inherited this love for Urdu poetry from my mother and unfortunately enough, not her voice (that doesn't prevent me from singing anyway). I certainly can't write because of so many rules for it. You see, it requires special talent to look at the world in most basic forms and metaphorize with something completely different. Like here, the poet calls himself as useless as a handful of dust,'musht-e-gubaar', Irshaad!!

na kisī aañkh nuur huuñ na kisī ke dil qarār huuñ
jo kisī ke kaam na aa sake maiñ vo ek musht-e-ġhubār huuñ
 -Muztar Khairaabadi


Rekhta offers an excellent database for Urdu related things- especially the dictionary! Yes! Being a native Hindi speaker, I would have been paralyzed without it. I think the cause of it is because Urdu is largely made p of words from a lot of languages, mostly middle-eastern, which we don't use in India generally. It is very much like colloquial Hindi sans poetic/aesthetic/sexy words. I said colloquial. With voices like Mehdi Hasan, Ghulam Ali and Noor Jahan, these epic works were immortalized in numerous Bollywood and Pakistani movies.

Another thing I like about Ghazal and Sher is their dissection of an emotion. I will explain. If I have to tell my boyfriend to break up if he is not paying attention to me. My best (utterly dry and non-poetic but sad) way is,"Stop leaving me hanging off your word. Let's finish this off once and for all". And this is how Ahmed Faraz said it:

ab tak dil-e-ḳhush-fahm ko tujh se haiñ ummīdeñ
ye āḳhirī sham.eñ bhī bujhāne ke liye aa


Or talk about the arrogance of man. Every particle shines with His glow (and yet!) every breath says that God exists because of I exist! (yup! Arrogant. But I do believe in it as a partial atheist):

har zarra chamaktā hai anvār-e-ilāhī se
har saañs ye kahtī hai ham haiñ to ḳhudā bhī hai 

Last example. And this entire ghazal is particularly dear to me because it rejoices romance from the woman's perspective and very cutely recalls stuff like,say, hesitation the man felt on their first night together. That is something really audacious for a woman being from Indian subcontinent (Pakistan) during the 1980's. Nevertheless, if it results in such beautiful work, I am all for it. Listen to Mallika-e-tarannum sing it:


वो मेरे नज़दीक आते आते
हया से इक दिन सिमट गये थे
मेरे खयालों में आज तक
वो बदन की डाली लचक रही है
  
How do I resist smiling at this and accept that they want to remove Urdu from NCERT syllabus! And of course, how are they going to teach students about 'Inqalab Zindabad' ? I just cannot consent to this! #NotInMyName

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Separating Science From the Scientist

In October 2016, Ditchling Museum of Art + Craft organized an exhibition to discuss a famous sculptor of 20th century, Eric Gill. The theme of the exhibition was to discuss Gill's art from a fresh perspective of that of an abuser. Later next year, Kevin Spacey was written off House of Cards where he played the lead role following sexual harassment charges. These, among many others, are attempts of art industry to address some uncomfortable questions -  should art of an abuser be appreciated? or rather,  can art be separated from the artist? On this issue, Ed Siegel compared artists to scientists suggesting that it is crucial to evaluate art separate from the artist just as science is evaluated separate from scientists. This is an interesting observation. It implies that the work matters more than the individual. It also implies that with one or more good results, everything uncomfortable about you, all of your personal or professional misdemeanors, can be brushed under the ca...

Is Science a meritocracy?

Update -Finally publishing the draft from dec 2019    Somebody on twitter found it absurd to call science a meritocracy. I would agree to it in the past but now I am not sure.  My prime focus is on marks. It never bothered me until I met two researchers from Max Planck institute in a symposium. Apparently, the grades are taken very seriously in Europe for PhD admission. Just like in India.That is ridiculous on two levels. One, the message it sends out- ONLY high scoring students can, and should be privileged to, make a career in science. Second, the assumption that those students will be good at doing science. Because unlike PhD admission, these may not be followed up with an interview and only based on merit the batch of students is prepared. And the majority, the <85% scoring population, has to look out for other means to show how competent they are. And that is really really worrisome for anyone who wants to increase the engagement of society in STEM o...

Why so complacent in the high drop out rate?

I had an interview recently at a renowned lab here in India. I admired her work and simply couldn't wait to talk to the PI, tour the lab and telling her that I am a big fan. After the interview, the PI told me about how they are little frugal about lab supplies (and the practice apparently served them well), the 11-12 hour commitment to the lab and their high drop-out rate. All of this was to signify how science-y they are probably. However, I found these practices very uncomfortable. Especially her complacency about the drop-out rate. Indian scientists seem to find a merit in the high drop-out rate from their lab. It is like a badge of honor. Why do you have to assume the reason for them leaving is because you are demanding and/or the student is incompetent? That is stupid. There are numerous reasons a student can quit working with someone. It doesn't necessarily have to be something wrong about the student!  Why do you have to showcase it like a crown? It ...